ARCH PRINCE’S PUBLIC LIFE FACILITATORS APPRECIATION – APPLICABLE STATEMENT BY THE ROYAL HERMIT ®

THE ARCH PRINCE IKPE UNO

I am told I have delayed the celebrity problem until it became a crisis but I have as I could never explain the real reasons I dropped out of University because people made statements at Government buildings to confirm a stupid idea that if we organised ourselves as young people, to make sense of our local community and some peoples way was to decide I was to be seen without my clothes on so people can imagination touch my penis and finger my bum to make me work civil rights while they cling to my career publicity and social life to get rich, at the same time another group decided that everything which happened at the jobs market was a threat to them but those who gave them a living wage free of charge were looking for trouble as it simply made them a target and was not enough, I would be the one doing the wrong thing. Hence it is better to respond on a complain by complain basis where I too get to decide how much complaining warrants a response.

It has never stopped breaching my patents to find ways of making use of my career and literary work, such as would alleviate it of a need to show some respect for my person or what I did for a living, having since arrived at one in which its activities affected client interests and moved on to running it off in case I had enemies that were wealthy and wanted to reward its stupidities financially, created me such enemies on media and is now engaged with an abusive civil disobedience where it got to make statements that encumbered my Bookshop whilst drawing up comments about how brave I have been and what I needed to do with bravery if I wanted to deserve my career. It never stopped telling lies including the claim that I am making decisions which made it impossible for them to detach and move on whereas the main issue is a trick by which it handles my person abusively because it felt good to handle my person but really has no respect for me as well all together; so most of this was put to a popularity culture where those who picked up my public image and assets had to take into considering that this was the deal, the matter of working crime control publicity to ensure their gimmicks did not affect the general public but my wealth equity is now being used on me and I am the problem, I am a low life and criminals were better people willing to take a chance and make money, if affected by this social disposition, I receive threats from the famous with a big mouth, should I be seen doing anything with companies where I made some sacrifice because we brokered equity and the company was in negotiation with a client, it will size the opportunity to make me a character people bullied to befriend the wealthy, its ageist idiots will form co-operatives to raise funds that helped them buy shares in any companies and cultures I engaged in for this gimmick and they would be left acting as though they were paid to share m privacy with hoodlums and claim I was a low life. It is all generic really – the trouble maker youth seeking to get rich without doing work, the ageist gits seeking to get rich by handling my personality and the Celebrities that have not yet found a way to explain their actions besides the lies they tell alongside their sociopath civil rights idiots who had set a stage where nothing that belonged to me was out of bounds while claiming I had wrecked their society, just the way Politicians claim I am the one doing the wrong thing and the way I dropped out of University for it having received no real explanation as the fooling about at my expense continued. We are talking about the sort of abuses where women got involved with public Office on the basis of some public leadership matters where it may be assumed that doing one thing with me was the best idea but ended up doing harm, as this was the same kind of reasons that people needed to consult professionals when dealing with new born children and they will turn up to take their clothes off on my public image, pass about insults they were more important than I am because they got into bed with people in their own sordid world when not claiming my dress code wrecks their neighbourhoods, to leave me with a sense that I wanted to provide them a response which made worse their social problems including wealth and social inequality, whilst leaving me a perverted relationship with the broadcasting community to fool around with, all so that prostitutes turned out to serve me everywhere I went, whilst it complained about being victimised.

It does love to boast about causing me harm naturally but we are talking here about Politicians saying I delayed the responses until their gimmicks became a crisis and the reasons that I am bound to keep it going – for their part, a response to their madness will have indicated I was interested in their lifestyle, right down to the forming of groups to attack people for a history and show up here talking nonsense about the way I thought they had easy success, when their personality encourages people to get violent right down to the part where it makes such a mess of security services work that it created a public crisis everyday – I am not interested in their lifestyle but am living on social security because of their interest in my Bookshop, which makes two things that I certainty do not want, now the famous are about to decide if they wanted it to end as they would like or they wanted me to stop it painfully, starting with the part where they are supposed to build publicity for the people who bang walls and doors at them after they shared their own privacy with hoodlums and ethnic group sociopaths who shoot off their big mouth everywhere and watch people abusively on CCTV to work private security industry that antagonises law enforcement, not build one for me as a matter of practical jokes that affect client interests to stifle my finances until I did something brave for them, mocking and abusing and passing around the stupid insults, fooling around to an extent where even my ability to get into a personal relationship with other people had stagnated too, then claim to have been the victim on Media.

They do claim I called it up and there are abusive activities that I encouraged women to perform – for calling it up which is a matter of the fact that their gimmicks when done for affectionate reasons are never a problem, like we know that Celebrities have run it off on the basis of crime control publicity because they heard stories that I liked anal sex, the abusive activities I encouraged women to perform will be the part where its insults meant it had to live with the memory of me while keeping leadership of its family and it never learns, it is always so much fun especially on the roads. It is narcissism but it does not really affect me - I mean that I am more famous than they were, so for their gimmicks to affect me they needed to build publicity that I am not; this would then produce an outcome in which I lived somewhere, there was a distance between my career and the Media and if my career ended up on that media, it could end up there in somebody else's name instead of mine, so there has been some physical handling here, which disputes the idea that they were victims they claimed to be. This is an example of those instances where we ended up dealing with people suggesting that others think we faced a crisis and then I got it solved in a jiffy but all we have here is my Bookshop which is my property and out of bounds to the entitled, alongside the fact criminals had publicly paid attention to some of my activities, building up to the destruction of career, finances and personal life by famous fools who were entitled to see me fight for them on a scale of stupidities between one and ten which is at least a 9 but I have suffered it for 6 years living on social security, the fooling around at other peoples expense and with other peoples concerns when making their own money does not stop all the way to the Politicians unless it really did, they were sociopaths who got me to like their personality well enough for their stupidities to get close. The fact that criminals paid attention to what I am doing at some stage should never have affected public policy, not to mention the idea that it did as a matter of me getting to show I am brave enough to deserve my career but I think this matter will end when I become more calculative about it – saying 18 to 65 for the practical jokes and my 20 year career mess in terms of the trouble maker youth, ageist goons and the famous, with the Politicians as the icing on the Cake, as they would be the ones that I will shove into the violent orthodoxy of career crime neighbourhoods where these women could take up the need of the famous to ensure they were the doxy and could make others commit crimes, to a whole new level, all day long. In the end it should never have affected public policy as a matter of the famous being reassured that they were in a position to bully people into doing violent things on their behalf but these are the sort of stupidities that will ensure when we do meet over it, the idiots who continue to handle my Bookshop for it had better been twice my size, like their big mouth suggests. They do claim public policy was affected to ascertain who was in charge but are complaining I thought they ought to sex work problems find something to do with the country that existed in their head urgently and on a schedule or somebody will do it for them and then I will be the one ordering their steps.

There is no history of being a trouble maker as suggested either, just the idea I think Politicians were allies, whereas they were only finding out that sociopaths perform the same activities as psychopaths where people go for a walk at midnight, rape a woman before getting home and could not explain themselves, its just that sociopaths who want to talk their civil rights where you are doing constitutional matters of trying to feed the population whilst making sure people did not try to kill each other because they wanted a holiday for the rest of their lives and did not mind being hung drawn and quartered for it either, were doing the right thing and I the wrong when I kept them from my career and finances, except when Politicians were out of their depth concerning the abuses picked up from what they found out, talking nonsense at me - so they have decided to build this gimmick where I am showered with insults for an entire 24 hours, then they can reroll it again and again, to bend me to their will and that of their famous fools, then leave it to their distant violence career crime personality neighbourhoods and grandparents, to pretend we had not ended up with a massive problem. They do claim they have had fun at my expense but it is an old story they are just a bunch of well-dressed hoodlums – my main concern was my career and applicable crime control public image but now I am caught with abuses and financial destruction caused by a bunch of guys and girls who are always making such a mess of security services work that they create others a crisis and get on to do a thousand and one stupid things with peoples lives and careers each time they were trying to make their own money. So this is about to become the next stage of my response i.e., me, them and the crime control publicity, preferably with European men in Hollywood USA as the centre piece but for the time being no warnings are yet getting through and they were the only people doing the fighting in this place. It is much the same as the gimmick where they will spend my Office an Status to feel good, of which my first response was to do with the way the legitimate response to my career was to build a counter publicity profile that asked questions about who the hell I am and whether others were important enough to take my career and do it with a sense of toughness and dignity, which is a legitimate response to being told what others did for a living last time we checked, so it seems that I am set to do another one closer to home.

I. Uno I

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland