COMPANY CEO
AT BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISING LEADERSHIP ©
THE ARCH PRINCE I UNO
The misunderstanding on media of what I say so that
I might have to clear it up or loose earnings which is one of their most
popular tools of vandalism of course is entirely understood; what I said
however is that you cannot pass up intellectual property because somebody was
unable to make a business work since it is a recession, so the prognosis is
that the business that survive should be able to employ everybody, therefore
when people do their wealth distribution and social equality, it is very clear
they must do it only when and where they themselves are unemployed. I have said
this in other ways; in fact barely 12 months after the recession took hold and
they started to attack me because I look like I am thriving, I did mention that
when people see business is at odds against them it is important they prepare
to get jobs immediately. What has emerged five years on is that those who
normally find work in order to gather money and buy shares in other peoples
companies to make even more money, have been confused about what this means
claiming I tell them what to do for vandalising my income is the reason. It
therefore gets better because since they apparently state inferiority complex
and a desire that needs to be fulfilled as the reasons they will not pack up a
failed business during a recession and plan to get jobs, when everybody else
especially me can make sacrifices to ensure they are successful, so it is a
matter about which we have been considering political instability as well and
reminds us that they cannot stay outside our television screens because they
are actually very big fools who know they have a problem with competition. I for my part cannot let it fly because it is
an economic policy of contraction i.e. businesses are starved of cash they
should make available at a capitalist market, while those of us that are
successful need to make sacrifices so they can be as successful as the others
that were successful; the sacrifices we make and the fact their businesses had
failed in the first place. I mean, you handle people’s property when they have
not given you permission to and thereby cause damage to finances in the process
because of the following multiple choice answers?
Above all else of course is the fact this is how
they ruin it and they have already begun hate campaigns as we speak complete
with the people others should be certain are responsible and so you are forced
to start kicking them before hand. I don’t normally make much of it because I
like to use them to punish the Politicians who do not know the difference
between their vanities and their jobs i.e. Mr B has a problem with Mr A because
she lives in a Mansion next door to his flat, so he starts a campaign about
wealth distribution which Politicians know gets to mean he has got them over a
barrel, so what they turn up to say is that Mr A must play his game so that
they might have jobs otherwise Mr A will loose the house which is her pride and
joy and so when asked why they bring the house into the question, they say
people dare not tempt them as they are in control of the male side of society
while those they are talking to are just linked to the female side and when
they do this, you simply want to kill them. For me, over a venture as simple as
book selling, it is one of those things people do with rudeness that brings out
the worst from perfectly good people.
I.
Uno
United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland