FIRM GAINS FROM ROYAL OFFICE AT WORLDS CULTURES INSECURITY SECURITISATION EQUITIES ®

THE ARCH PRINCE IKPE UNO

It appears that in consideration of the same changes to the world of social instability some people will regularly set themselves up and speak of things such as 'counter revolution' and do it at my expense. About which I cannot say enough times that the problem is that I am a Book seller not somebody idiots familiarise themselves with to be inspired to say something important or anything else for that matter. With regards however to this 'counter revolution' issue, what they are referring to, is the fact that they tend to want their ideas about how people should be governed to be listened to and so therefore think familiarities with me in a condition where doing so is substituted for my books will get them such an attention through controversy and blackmail and so when I have had enough of it, I tend to go to great lengths to ensure those opinions are very well informed, then back track and ensure it will only be listened to in hell. What must be happening here therefore I assume, is that people have gone from finding an excuse for a product as a means of extracting an income from my property instead of working to theirs, to a process of telling me to share my earnings or else. I am not saying it is a problem in anyway; the whites are always turning up in public places to ensure that the whole world knows through public and National Media that I will never breathe unless a racist is having what I have as well and the rest are just Far East idiots and Tourism Economy fools looking for the good life, getting up to the usual activities, expressing powers of their deviance because others wish to enjoy money they have worked for, which besides the work of politicians will never make any sense. In the end, what they play around with has to do with people who manage state provided security for me, getting around with me, which has also meant in their view that any idiot can have a go at doing so as well but whilst those who do, do not use it for commercial purposes, the question of what to use it for falls to those who wish to use it for commercial purposes in their view. I have set out my warnings and they I am aware are not deaf – I already had become notorious for these things, doing them in a social context, the next time I am off to it, it will have to become part of my career all together. Bearing in mind that at the end of the day, the truth about it has more to do with considerations that it is wrong to damage peoples livelihoods but the question that these Corporate and Private Interests workers of vandalism continue to answer, is that of what would happen if it was up to them and in a condition that they would make more money if I were for example homeless and the answer they continue to give is that they would do it without a shadow of a doubt. I am tired of being tempted by them, bearing in mind I am a bit short tempered too but they like to make out I am easy to get along with, there is no 'counter revolution' therefore to be found in such activities; I should express the fact that they need to get off the Books and market place and leave me alone – not tell me whether or not I have got state provided security, like they always find their excuses to escalate provocations when they want, which I suppose suits them anyway. I am still not giving up the control of the finances of those stupid local communities their girls are too insolent for anybody to become that Liberal, it is as though they breathe insults towards me, and I cannot breathe the free air; their recent alliance with the City and Bankers will escalate this problem most.

I. Uno I

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland