HH THE ARCH PRINCE’S LONDON STOCK MARKET LEADERSHIP PAPER ©

THE ARCH PRINCE I UNO

With respect to a process of being party to a means of settling the historical changes of the world and detachment of politics from it, it appears that there are certain equities and securities that have emerged from it. Most of that which are concerned with me are linked directly to the sale of my books but I have however securitised that which concerns my holdings in the LSE at the Golden Kings Emporium, work is still in progress with respect to other sectors of the FTSE itself but the top 100 have had this matter settled there. The intention is that I wish to have full control of the fluctuations of FTSE Stocks and expenses I might part with which ensure it is stable may also produce the result of an increased productively. The status matter on this issue is that of the fact people ought to cease to treat the media in the way they do i.e. I have a working court occupied by female journalists who work with me on this matter via their profession and there are vandals from all corners of the media with respect to it; treating these women as though the property belonged to them or rather unfavourably, always have damaging effects; the economic aspect of matters is not their job, journalism is but it should be seen they have considerable sway over matters and therefore can deploy their professions to protect themselves and their interests, their function is strictly to pain my Equities and securities at the Court in a favourable light within the process of doing their jobs and sometimes they do get rewarded for this, it should be see too that recently other media idiots especially the male ones have made a point of duty of taking away their property thus from them, taking over their companies etc. The standards as such and risk of getting involved with these men and other media figures is high and does not do the stock market itself any good, so those who do simply inflict a punishment on themselves, however if I were to be displeased with the behaviour of a certain business it is likely I will deploy their business for the pleasure of a very destructive working Court on the media to do whatever they like with to look after their children e.g. mummy works on television is situation that does not gain much from the breeding of bad children that parents cannot control so that companies can make them spend; this is the fundamental issues but the disputes may vary and if they do I would not mind handing a business to the court to make a public example with

Another matter which surfaces is local attitudes, with respect to the prognosis of behaviours as a factor of wealth ownership and acquisition: with respect to this, there is interests to be seen as prone to destruction of behaviours are encouraged at the stock market which favour those who are of the opinion that it is okay for what ever little money or life sweetening goods they have been able to purchase for personal use becomes a means of violence, bullying and domination. This is bad for the stock market as well as it is bad for the manufacturing industry and I am not suggesting that there will be no people from overseas why try to ensure that there is nothing done to ensure it works otherwise – this is however the United Kingdom and not the various countries they come from. Working with this prognosis will enable stock brokers to see the importance of their role thereof as regards the manufacturing and financial industries and will greatly boost the productivity of the system, especially with respect to the consideration that securities can never be brokered enough when it comes to the destructive activities that human beings are known to perpetrate on such prognosis. A typical example is the popular irony that people absolutely do not act with intent to do wicked things in anyway whatsoever. This should not be confused with a sense of appreciation or even love for enterprises and their products, the cost security wise of social, political, Government and industry is unfathomable as it stands. Their possession are meant to be things we ought to love to ignore, no matter how hard they try to make us notice them and more so violently; it will never change the market if it is not noticed. Market changes only when we act in fear of them because it is on this fear that we create excess and it is on this excess with regards to security especially and then equities by bullying and intimidation that they thrive, become relevant and or exist at all in the first place, which is not to suggest that we are still not paying for it all.

The final matter is that of girls who propose and suppose that they have great levels of beauty based influences; they are likely to pick up on what I have written here and to act to create violence based disillusionment and also to strengthen their ties when they do with their Asian economy friends, as most cases work out in such ways. I should reiterate that they are the most notorious source of stock market vandalism, destruction and bad decision.

I. Uno

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland