NATIONAL SECUIRTY UK AT
ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE ©
THE ARCH PRINCE I. UNO
With respect to matters of National security and
perspective around UK interests, it seems that the Government (UK) and its
Political people will not spend as much of their time telling the rest of the
world that security a Nation creates for its interests, especially economic
ones is not for sharing, as much as they will spend time telling me I need to
get prepared to get out of the Euro zone as insolently as they possibly can.
For my part the questions as still as easy as they were; I will not be straying
far from Europe where most of my interest lie, no body just gets off telling me
to pack off and move away from Europe like that and this is what they need to
understand and for them, they speak of difficulties in following my line of
plan, especially with respect to matters like the special relationship between
the US and the UK and this is because it is the old issue that Politicians have
not understood since the economic problems began, the issue at the very heart
of the crisis in Europe itself i.e. you only take what you need, you cannot
just take it because it is there and available, this is incredibly
irresponsible and more so because you do not have national security apparatus to
protect interests that you grab wantonly and by the time you have created
enough National security apparatus in anticipation they must have dissipated;
which of course is also a matter that if we wish to dig into will show clearly just
how economically responsible developing economies have been in years since
their so called rise began, right from where and when it began all together. Now
on the Falklands, there are matters about how the Argentinean government has
received letters from the UN secretary general stating their claim to the
country. In the end it appears that the confusion has more to do with what a
law is and so it is not difficult to predict without reading what such a letter
would contain. Nothing more than the fact based on laws with regards to
territory and territorial waters Argentina has claim to the Falklands. This is
much the same as the international community would give the UK claim because
for the past 30 years we have designed yearly budgets to cater for the needs of
the people of those Islands and it was only when oil was discovered there that
the whole politics changed and so they wanted it back which is really stupid. I
mean does the Argentinean government know what a defence budget is and how much
it costs to run a defence? Do they wish to find out?
Of course it will not just end with the Falklands as
such, there is the problem of these things having the banking it does because
of stupid Americans who gets into secrete societies and influence things then
suppose they can influence just about anybody and it was the same while Senator
Obama was getting elected and now he is president wants a new respect from me
to top those insults and abuses up. So for them it is the endless creation of
abuses from electorates and Presidents and big stick idiots in the regions and
for me those their attacks will soon lead to a case where we have to have a
clear explanation on why any of those their activities is named civil rights,
bearing in mind it is not yet obvious to them I don’t like them in anyway
because my life revolves around church. So when this is over we will likely
make sure no body gets to attack British Interests in the South Americas ever
again. For them the story is that it is the backyard of the US and for the US
on that particular story it is a matter of the fact Americans should not be
electing idiots into government office that want to do cultural things they
cannot do and want to do and no body would hold against them if they did not
do, so unnecessarily. For the Argentineans the talk about giving up colonial
history will work alongside their American friends to create a condition where
there will be an explanation for how and why those things they are civil rights
when they know they are evil. So usually for now when the idea of it being
named civil rights is contended, they always make me understand it is about
dominance not civil rights and I have no idea what their problem with my books
is in that case, clearly of which it seems they are still all over the place
because the books are not hurting badly enough and those are just the books
anyway.
As for the Greeks and claim I have stolen their
culture and stuff like that. I have no idea what it means for my part, all I
know is that it will never be clear what they mean when they say somebody with
an office split between church and state wants with Greek democracy, so if they
want me to have a go at them I can do so any time. It is not to say I am
unaware of the issues which have more to do with the fact even countries that
do not have royalty anymore still have that link and they make use of the cultural
endeavours of existing royals in the continent; I have done my best for my part
– making sure they are aware that it is all very well to get around using
political office to grab all the money in the country setting yourself up as a
business man that will later do people favours of employing them while you make
your families rich but in the end you need to think about the far right and
their ballerina and the connection they have with politics and what they are
likely to get up to as well, claims I have stolen their culture will one they
see me loose it as well. I am aware I keep my work and use it to wind people up
but not allowing anybody get on media to get rich with it as if I am their
equal and I will not be making a lot of money from it soon enough myself, so
they can get to know me as time progresses. You see they know those things
their media idiots tell are lies but love to get along with it to steal
prerogatives for a while.
So as it applies therefore all the way to the US, I
have not yet begun cashing into such things as the president of the US enjoying
stealing my income over claims there is colonialism and he wants power and
until I start to do such things to raise funds and wind them up to find out
what they want to do, so they can find out what I will do with such money as
well, alongside the money I raise from peddling them and those stupid secrete
societies that will not respect the fact I was selected to support a Queen who
is leader of the Church and therefore was never going to get along with their
evil demands from day one, like they want to peddle me and then they can find
out what I will do with the money when they come round and boast like they
always do.
As for a process where talking the way I do sound
feeble when I am actually unable to raise any money from anything because the
politicians have seen to that, I have no clue what the Politicians must have
seen to anyway around here. The truth of course rather being that they are
stupid fundamentally and there are a few issues about it. One is to do with
academic work and prospects in life and the other is to do with fame and
reputation. In terms of the academic work and prospects in life part, the
reason that Mr A spends 9 hours on his work and knows it is what is needed to
pass his exams, while they spend 3 and expect what is left to b given them via
socialism and civil rights otherwise there will be an unfair society is because
it is impossible for them to push themselves beyond a certain level on account
they are lazy and wicked and not because somebody else is doing capitalism
irresponsibly and of course when they mention such nonsense it creates real
problems on account that a company can only be as successful as its managers
and so when people manage well that is responsible capitalism initiated by
socialism and when they do badly that is capitalism being what it normally is
but they will go no where and the parliament will continue to be their hide out
for the purpose all the time. The other matter of fame has to do with how in their
eyes it is impossible for you to get off and tell somebody to get off a stage
when he loves climbing up it to use your work to get people to notice him and
sell music CDs and get rich and more so without permission, then determine the
route to success to be that of if he dumps cultural evils on you, runs off to
be famous and returns to ask you for it as well, in their eyes, it is an
impossible feat for somebody to tell them to shut it and never mention stories
about doing things with others in which they were the boss and of course they
will not go anywhere else but the parliament and then pretend it is their
personal and private property. So in actual fact they have not got an idea
where those insults will likely lead bearing in mind that they are born out of
wrecking my work so I can work for another one that they will have power to
take like they are brain damaged at the area of their minds where they are
supposed to be normal, hence the reason they are so fundamentally and
academically stupid and I have mentioned it enough times they need to stay away
from my business and market place.
They say these things take up all my strengths but it
does not. The way I see it is as simple as the fact that they are so evil they
establish Church the way they want and claim it is about serving God in their
own way but even then when a Christian sets up a business they are always seen
around and no body will ever work out what for except the obviously evident
damages that they do to it. In the end it boils down to the fact they want some
Christian to be stuck somewhere while they use his property and existence to
have the kind of fundamentalisms by which to get rich on stock markets and so
on but that is the reason I will not readily use my work to get rich unless I am
using it to make money for its own sake and merit and they will have such
things in hell only too, for their part.
These are the things they knew they took risks for
with those stupid secrete societies of men, they knew they took those risks if
somebody had an office that was split between serving Church and serving state
and so they knew there would be no preparation involved when and if I had to
defend myself. No body has had his energy all taken from him here and I will
handle them again seriously like I have before, over that peddling me and my
faith to get rich thing – after all we are now all set up to do the same to
them as well. As for Politicians in the UK, they say they don’t want
Christianity to affect their daily affairs but when you write your Christian
book, they are seen all over it, claiming they are having bilateral
understandings, what for? We are know they will gain nothing from it; for my
part I know of nothing that will cause me to make use of peoples books by
stealing them and reading them so they might never have money; if they are my
enemies I will buy the books first and read it in order to argue with them
about it and if they are not I cannot imagine doing anything of that sort to my
enemy, so this thing is now in their hands and the way out remains as it always
was; my right to earn from my own job and property no matter how stupid they
are.
Every new thing carries potential risks of being
entangled with preferential treatment fools who speak of nothing but their
suffering which was brought about by those who did or said something that took
away a big break based on preferential treatment which is meant to have been a
function of the fact they have deserved it and have worked to the edge of their
tether to do so, especially when it has much to do with freedom and normalcy. They
say there are things I do to affect other people’s jobs which has to do with
what I say I am and what I say about myself. I would think with respect to it
that what I said about Christianity would do but clearly it is not enough. The
main issue of course that when Politicians and businesses see people, what they
want to do with them is make them into something they are not to suit their
interest i.e. see a Christian and bend him until he becomes something else like
a civil rights goon that you normally take advantage of to get rich and so it
is in that I get to bend them as well, like break up your business and hand me
the equities to get rich with – now that they have told me obviously. First of
all, it is already crowded here, even the aspects of my life that exists
because I am single is a problem i.e. I get hunted until I speak of pornography
and that means my income gets drained by fame freaks and get rich idiots
Because I am not married and yet once I am married although the family will
fill that gap, I will be doing things like school run so there will be other
gaps opened up, all for somebody to turn up and bend me like that and of course
they can bend me again when I am married as it were. I always imagine they do
it because they have checked me and found I have got more assets and
liabilities than they do and therefore bound to get richer than they but who
told them to find their way into my personal life and privacy in order to find
that out? I mean even if this matter is settled like he will be richer than me
and I cannot stand it, they still owe me the privacy thing and I will not let them
get away with it, if things I say as a result of looking after my self is
feeble because I did not take revenge on those who ruined me so that I can come
up with things they can take for abilities to control me. It is all they do
with their time, bending people into what they are not, they consider themselves
to be gods I suppose and it was the same years ago when I decided to hand them
my equities because they had the access and even put myself to work on it for
them because I was hoping to let go on the basis of there being a thriving
employment market where I am insignificant enough to get a job but they have
cut me off from my academic work and any chances of making money to turn up and
tell me I do and say things about myself which interfere with peoples jobs,
bending me into something I am not, alongside my benefits being affected with a
big mouth. So I know how I will get the jobs I want bending them as well for my
stuff. I do think about it, with all the things I might have had to spend my
time on for a job and then a family and then a social life, would I still make
time and energy even if I do take class A drugs for my purpose, to find
somebody whose life I wreck my taking away his academic work and his life to
have a means, just so I can get on political places to claim he says and does
things which interfere with my job in order to bend him into what he is not? It
is in their hands as I have said before, they will since they do not currently
know what it means to have a job and not earn from it, work out when to leave
me to earn from my work and property and then the problems will dissipate or
they can hold out still anyway. Yes I know I am not worthy to be allowed to
face only the challenges of the chances and the market because I have left what
I had for those who needed more security and went off to get another-pulled it
off without being taken advantage of by feminists and even the evil side of
female society. I have no clue why this is such a big issue when they are the
ones that know what democracy is all about; obviously by the way human rights
come cheap as it were – we have ever seen them fund peoples right to clothing
and things like that. It is the destruction of these things they get to give to
people out of their extensive goodness that causes me to behave the way I do as
well.
It still all works in the way that it has always done;
first your Christianity will separate you from their culture and they will
stuff it into your personal life and then your academic work will do it and
they will take that away stifle your finances because of course by then they
have become bolder than usual and it is only when it gets to mean that there
must be a reckoning with that stupid culture we hear them complain.
Next we hear them speak of how the problem is that it
is difficult to work out that there is any possibility I might stop somewhere
or have any limits. I wouldn’t know, I mean the results must be that if I don’t
stop somebody will get killed on account of me and so I will get killed as
well, which I suppose will happen like the pinnacle of all my achievements.
They think they want to build big companies with branches all over the world
for which people will hate their guts and of course are not there yet.
The trouble with education reform is still the same
old issue. Politicians always like those guys that do well on the academic
stuff but not the practical and career stuff, whereas it is those that need are
good at the career and practical stuff that need to be seen in school more
while those that are good at the academic stuff need to be seen having jobs
more. So the same old story of robbing those that need the education the most
is how it always works and they will never tell that it is about power at first,
they will always say it has to do with education reform.
For me they say I speak sweet but I dig up peoples
past in order to set up something that I have come to claim is my career.
Whereas the truth about it is that they worked out that a teenager was unlikely
to be subject to their dominations and insults and oppressions, so they sought
out somebody that no body would provide for if he did not provide for himself,
whose life they can destroy to have social power and the result of course is
that when you are at that age you already have a career going, so plod on plod
on and trample all over them in the process of getting about a career is not
the same as digging peoples history to look like I have something I don’t.
However if the digging peoples history to look like I have something I don’t is
to be considered in its own merit then, it is a question of whether I had
permission and if I had permission it is classified as learning and there we
are again, robbing those who have more need for an education and letting those
who don’t gather the knowledge and carry it around like a giant tool box to
scratch and bruise people with all over the place like they were cultural
people who have never seen a class room before, whose problems cannot be
controlled by them, whom you must try and tolerate.
At the heart of the whole issue is the simple fact
that they love to create me some academic and financial set backs then run off
to stand on public media and claim everything I do as their own. First of all
the result is that they complain I damage things they own to extract my work
whenever people take it but what really happens is like creating a nut in which
they have placed my work and I am never too certain that the outer shell that
holds my work is valuable to them or aware that it is, mainly because there is
no point to being so either. Its like the art of
taking it which they have to back up obviously. This is how we end up with a
process where I confiscate fame belonging to Politicians and they get to tell
me I will give it up so the country can work the way they want and such a thing
will only happen in hell. So of course it is easy for them to claim abilities
are creating world peace and making so much noise about those they are superior
to in order to dominate.
This then brings us to the other issue of lack of
regard; whereby they know the bad attention will come after me if they do these
things but do it anyway, so instead of finish up what I need to do early so I
don’t get attention from the bad sides of society, I end up in a place where I
drag on and on and on and on while they build up that attention on the most
public place imaginable for me as if I don’t exist, for no other reason but the
destruction of the best to give the worst the chance to be rich because they
have the tendency for respecting the fathers. This eventually leads to those
extra threats that their idiots bandy around on public Television without
respect for the fact that they might have swindled a Monarchy out of a Crown
and a Faith to create a Parliament but it does not necessarily mean that I want
such a thing to happen to my faith as well. No body gets to get away with
threatening me with his wickedness on account that in his view the will of God
will not be done on earth as it is in heaven because he can have an opinion
about it and turn off to find way of holding absolutely everything accountable.
For this was their own lives and their own faiths and
their own property. All so they can destroy the best and give the worst the
chance to be rich because they tend to respect the fathers more. So if the
process of creating me financial and academic set backs in order to get on
media and continue to try claiming to be me while threatening me with racism
becomes funny, then that is where we also tend to have an institutionalised
problem. I will not get into a hurry to do anything with anything I have but
they will get rich and famous with it somewhere in hell.
Of course they tell me I talk like that but people get
to use it to be famous anyway, which is perfectly fine; people are entitled to
do things behind my back as much as they want if they want but if I see any of
it, I will rip it, after all it is easy for them bearing in mind they have got
Politics and can do world peace (those stupid insults).
So first of all, people say that I like to dig up the
past but I don’t; its a matter of personal challenges i.e. I am not allowed to
do it but if I don’t I will have personal problems and no body would care if I
have them. The reason it gets everywhere of course is the media idiots that
seem to complain all the time as well. I mean when they do people might mistake
it for the end of the world; like going off to the UN to put to the president
of the US for example, or using my work president of China or Russia, something
I have said and put it over and over and over again until he or she develops a
mind set where hearing anything from that source is tiresome but still the
question looms if that does get to change anything anyway.
Like the other stuff they claim about how I condone
sexual abuse. I find it difficult to figure out how a person whose work with
the highest authority in the land has to do with not giving stuff to the
powerful because they always take what they want anyway, gets to condone sexual
abuse but if they say so we have to take them at their word, the problem of
course is that while they complain of their own dangerous situation it does not
change anything, bearing in mind they are awesome bitches and will likely tell
me it is brave too, which means I will have to b forgiven for thinking they
liked it as well. The men on the other hand are brain damaged of course at the
point where they should think and think straight, so they think they can follow
me around and not have it documented all the things they do to create dangerous
situations which if anything happens I will raise in the Court of Law as well
to take their liberties away from them with. I know they operate in a very
organised fashion and should not have to explain myself and I am not trying to;
the trigger of how somebody’s wife and or daughter is enjoying the best things
in life while they have to work harder than everybody else is enough for me but
their men can keep yapping it is the damages they cause here that is their biggest
problem so far and point of complain as well, with those insolent corruptions
of involvement.
Of course it is a work in progress, at some point I
will be able to gather up enough facts and pictures and videos and hand them to
the law commission for a recommendation and all the dangerous situations I have
created for them as well by then will be seen as self defence, so we will end
up with a completely new and different society. They love to claims I get
involved with them when they are the ones especially in the US that normally
have parties and drink expensive stuff on my property while I wait to raise
funds from my books which they can get off on media and take turns to use
temporarily until I can sell none in order to catch up with my own kind knowing
they will never help me with money or anything like that. So with respect to
what I might do about it; it seems that every Politicians who sees a stupid
cultural girl get involved with him knows why they do and that it is because
they have selected me as target but refuse to do anything until they have him
or her over a barrel and I too do not care what their problem is either, all I
know is that these girls lie a lot and I am fed up destruction here wreaked by
them and their men. What people need to do seems to be another question and it
is quite simple; there are products I have broken up and brokered equities with
businesses to create and they can buy those bearing in mind the fundamentalisms
they serve but keep their vandalism parties and dirty sex and strange
relationships with money on media out of my work and property whenever they do,
otherwise I will eventually get to do the party and the dirty sex as well and
there is nothing else to it; obviously people like to roll with the bad company
especially the media that ravages peoples personal lives and feel I should be
paying for it and lie all the time – feeling compelled to lie about me
frequently as well, I simply feel that when I say people should not do a thing
with my property they should not do it, I have the right to own anything in
this world and do anything I wish with my own life.
Where I stand in education is simply that it is the
Politicians that mismanage it and the schools and universities that do a good
job and that is because the schools and Universities work towards a set need
and curriculum, however on my personal view the skills and qualification ranges
are too tightly packed and so the economy will pay the price eventually by
aging very quickly. With respect to private education however I think it
depends on what people want; if somebody has a job for example and wants to get
qualified for it thus feeling that private education is the best chance and has
got the money, then there is no reason not to go for it; as far as I am concerned
the requirements are exactly the same, somebody gets private education to
manage his parents company and another public education to manage another
persons company, if both put time into it they will be transported to bigger
companies at the same time if that is what they want to achieve. The idea that
madness only tends to exist in a certain area of society is not good enough; I
mean any normal human being spends less than what they have no matter how small
and like where they live unless it is dangerous so that they get help from the
government to move somewhere else. These goons are currently suffering at my
hands because of the things they do to me on account of the fact I am have to
rent their piffling homes and the punishments I levy on them for it.
As for their celebrity trouble makers, the tax issue
is still on hand in their case and matter and here they say that they want a
government which sees that everybody pays the same rate of tax. Absolute
rubbish of course because what they are suggesting is that a comedian by
himself without government amenities and social stability and public security
can make six million pounds, of all the people in the country who pay taxes
these are the group, these celebrity culture goons and cultural elitist idiots
are the ones that rip off the government the most and yet are the same who
complain about paying taxes the most of which the taxes are not their money at
all according to the contract they signed and therefore is not something they
say for. I mean a comedian stands in a theatre built with government funds,
supported by the lottery along a rail network in the centre of a city which the
government built and tells jokes in the political system and atmosphere created
by the government to earn six million pounds, only for the government to split
it 50% 50% with him; It is incredible but even more incredible for him to act
in a way which sees that the government does not get its own money because he
and this is the part that really makes sense, he is paying too much to the
government. My point on this matter of everybody paying the same rate of tax is
not just that this is a cosmopolitan city steeps in hundreds of years of
history where that game people play where they blackmail us with things they
will do to ensure they can go anywhere and make it like London to make
themselves comfortable will never work because there are difficult things to
change like the restructuring of the entire economy for example the fact US or
German bond yields take between five and ten years while UK ones take 23 years
and above and this is not including the need to find the assets first of
course. There is also the fact no body knows what they are talking about with
respect to everybody paying the same rate of tax, it must mean they are suggesting
that those who live in the outskirts of the city village so to speak must pay
the same level of taxes as they do and finally the one that gets me the most
being that they never smell the dangers, which is that they have become so
important and so powerful that they play up one government to get rich and play
up another to determine how much taxes they pay to the other, then set about
telling Politicians everybody should be paying the same rate. It was about the
same issue over intellectual property proliferation and destruction where
people thought they could come round to do business in the UK over a set
period, find out everything and move to where they could pay less
taxes some years ago and now we have a completely different world
because of it.
So in the end I am accused of playing around with
celebrities while at the same time pretending when I turn on them over taxes I
have legitimate right. It is utter nonsense because there are celebrities and
there are celebrities;
you have a process where somebody is famous and has a great
personality on one hand and another person wants to therefore make use of his
or her personality to make films that others want to watch, so the question is
what you would do if he was about to run out of finds for the film. Then there
is the other that shows you no quarters when it comes to the ability to smell
out things you should be doing to provide him structures to be rich and famous
with and takes it all including the destruction of your mind and even
countenance and temperament to create his fame and fortune and of course when
finished starts to cheat you out of the taxes as well. They claim to be similar
but could not have been any more different.
Now they say what my job means is that I will catch
them all and stop them all. I have no idea what would possess anybody to get on
public Television to make such statements about another persons job but I do
know at this point that the next time they turn up on Television to have such
ideas by which to gut money from my income, I will resort to the physical
option of looking into it and that their stupid cultural elitism and the result
will be that I will make that Television a very terrifying place for them to
appear on at any point in time in their lives. I have never seen it before, a
condition where somebody is give a job to do and another tells them they cannot
do it with respect to this person or that because they are cultural elitists
and it came from that old rubbish of playing football at my royal estate and moving
into my right hand on that stupid media, so it has now come to a head. As for
the other claim that what I have said and done is an impossible promise to
fulfil, I cannot make out what promise exactly I am supposed to have been
making. I have only set out facts about why people should not do their champagne
parties on my equities and securities or have their dirty sex on them, as they
can only buy them and that is the end of what connection they have with them
is, I have only set out what I am famous for and a site and books with respect
to the business that I make a living with and nothing else. I am not saying it
is a problem, the businesses I broke equities with understand my campaign and
what my work is all about but for them this promises I make thing will lead to
something else before they keep their insults to themselves. So with respect to
how they are doing me a favour by not becoming racists, I don’t know where they
get the idea from either; the people responsible for that is black people, they
are the ones doing cultural elitism in the UK as well and while they are at it
they do not complain but like their white friends when somebody dies as a
result of racism it will be others that they suppose are responsible for doing
something about racism.
So I say black people cause problems
when they do cultural elitism and is it then my opinion that only white
people should be doing it? They ask their insolent questions as much as they
like all the time: but it will never change the fact these things have consequences
as it were. I mean a person must be seen outside by 12pm to 1pm every single
day and each time he is outside at that period creating himself lots of chances
he must never stop making out the reason is that he wants to gobble up your
life, that he wants you to deploy your strength and your intelligence towards
fighting for him so he can have anything he wants, he then turn up to do that
everyday with dangerous situations he creates for himself and ensures involves
you taking the risks and then turns out to extract an income from your work and
then make sure that he is getting from you absolutely anything you own which he
desires with that behaviour, more so based on the fact he can beat anybody up
and the desire is so intense that he gets to do it like some form of fascism.
Of course people die so that the rest of us can live in peace and I will never
allow nor become party to changing the way the will of God works in society for
them so that they can claim there is no God, especially so when these
activities are entirely built up around attacking religious people; they will
die and those their stupid parents who feel Children should be raised how they
have raised them will cry and God will be honoured. It is my turf, I have
considerable influence in Church and no body ever gets to hear me turn up in
their Political party meetings to shoot off an opinion, so it is never exactly
clear why they always think they can shoot one off at me and while I am at
work. So do I encourage racists to kill people; of course I do as it were – I
try to ensure my church stuff reaches everybody; racist, none racist, green,
blue, what have you and the message is as it has always been – respect another
mans religion when you are tougher than they are and you can make anybody hand
over anything they own which you happen to want.
I.Uno
I
United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland