POOR SOCIAL LADDERS AND CRIME PRIVILEGES ®

THE ARCH PRINCE IKPE UNO

The claim naturally is that I disturb neighbourhoods but the matter goes outside of Peace prognosis on National and Public threats. It grows into a matter of whole societies deciding I cannot be allowed to engage with myself and my work, considering their entire time and that of their communities are spent on the thought of crime, the committing of crime and the encouragement of criminal activity. Current precedent is that Liberal USA and its entertainment Industry claimed I am discriminating against them but we now know they clearly have no wish to act on what has grown into a Public crisis that goes beyond the boundaries of simple violent decadence.

For my part, saying so would support those who are in need but we are aware of eventuality whereby they were not only victims but also perpetrators of their own personal, financial and social crisis, their involvement with other peoples lives and concerns being entirely self invited at all times. Perpetual boast is that this is the fate all prancing characters that get caught up with people who are bigger than they are - I would rather have imagined it was the consequences of being caught up with social and sexual corruption, associated with money and security gimmicks.

It is normally suggested naturally that separating the British House of Lords from society considering how much the influences of the House of Commons and the Prime Minister has corrupted it currently, is something I cannot do even though I would love to do it or see it done and that my ideas about doing such things are born out of one of many people have to get things done in the most comfortable way imaginably which excludes some other people but of course with know that with respect to the first argument we are looking at the fact some things people do to others as crimes that are not written in the Books can be tolerated as culture and diversity but that at some stage when it had created its own sub culture the reality is then faced that somebody somewhere somehow will lose their lives over that particular culture hence if I am a Christian and think about saving my life, it should be equally applicable to everybody else hence for the second issue the answer is that the devising of comfortable ways of doing things which excludes other people is an invention of liars who believe that the crimes they have committed at every stage and level of society and social life which is not specifically written as law must be allowed to form a conversation in the House of Lords where the fate and outcome of society is decided but when occupied by socialists then the outcome of society is decided by society itself which is utter rubbish, hence making this separation is the best set up for a very bad situation and not something I cannot do. Money is not what the Law is.

I. Uno I

United Kingdom of Great Britian and Northern Ireland