RUINING THREATS AT THE BOOK CLUB ®

THE ARCH PRINCE IKPE UNO

I understand the dislike for me for personal but it is if a bunch of idiots were addicted to my personality whilst being disrespectful of it – in the end a matter of living with chronic pain and their inability to mind their business was criminal, the famous were on a wholly different league, in their case I was in a social disposition that was inferior to their own, from which I could serve them and just when their stupidities were set to reap the benefits, I had plans to change it which had to be stopped. They could pay for what they use they are simply not doing that yet. Ultimately it was this business of being able to manage my Trust and run my Bookshop from a standpoint where we can without interruption, engage in this gimmick where they were psychopaths that did not get to do physical damage to others and were constantly getting into trouble with others who then ended up with criminal records because they kept handling me even when they knew it would all set off on my public image, to invent insults about ways their safety and security relied on results where I did not have the public image anymore.

There is also always that silly abusive conjecture where it is suggested that my disposition was not financially viable, suggested by a bunch of people who think that making a private life mess which was displayed in public as a method of dealing with people who were not planning to be nice when sharing a society with others, puts them in charge, passing around the abuse to turn work I had done properly into a mess in its own right and showing up here to bully me into solving their personal problems, continued to suggest that eventuality in which people made a mess of their careers without paying was the look of their reality, with no thought or consideration for what was obvious evidence of the difference between them and people who were really in charge. I understand that since there was media narcissism to suggest the quasi criminals were okay and I am part of the problem, my experience has been what the quasi criminals endured during the years that I assisted them, particularly impactful with respect to the famous. Like it complains I always omitted talk about the way that it all became so terribly complicated for the famous because of me, it also suggested I talked until I gave myself away whereas what damages my finances was that a Clients interest in a trust might be an actual investment but their civil rights will progress from a need to fool around with my career publicity, backed by an entertainment idiot that was bank rolling it from the USA, into a gimmick that would move the Trust interests elsewhere through narcissism publicity. Eventually whilst this was all a process where we made sense of what lazy people were saying in terms of the most psychotic complaining about the wrong that was done to them and idiots who joined in on the abuse of the so called weak pathetic smaller men, only to find out they were not in charge, they claim my state provided security provoked them and that none could tell what my problem was just as much as I am a cry baby that will not give up my complicity with the system, as they complain more that I did everyday but each time it does appear it had become a credible prospect that I am the one making their personal decisions for them and I wanted to make the personal decisions for them proper, a famous idiots talking nonsense about handling me with a complex that encourages its stupidities to spend some fame money on a private army will intervene and now do not wish to cease trashing my Bookshop.

I. Uno I

United Kingdom of Great Britian and Northern Ireland